Here's what happened when I read the sentence you quoted about 29,000 children having died in the last 90 days: apparently I didn't read it at all. After seeing your comment here, I went back to skim-read the article again. That sentence was in a paragraph after mention of 12 million people being malnourished and 640,000 starving, and apparently that's when I stopped paying attention. Those numbers were already too much, and I mean the numbers were too much, instead of the facts they were trying to relate. That's the screwy part of this. It shouldn't matter how the news is conveyed when the reality is so horrifying, but it does matter. I read numbers such as "640,000" as if they say "mumble-mumble-big-number-etc" and instead of trying to understand them or get a picture of what they're saying, I just ignore them instead. I know that's not really what the article was talking about; it's just something I think is relevant.